Graylog AI-Powered Security vs Graylog Graylog: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Graylog AI-Powered Security

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in log volume will find real value in Graylog AI-Powered Security's AI-driven investigation capabilities, which collapse weeks of manual threat hunting into hours. The platform covers NIST DE.CM and DE.AE strongly, meaning anomaly detection and incident characterization are genuinely mature; hybrid deployment (cloud, on-premises, or mixed) removes the either-or constraint that blocks adoption at organizations with legacy infrastructure. Skip this if you need deep incident response orchestration or recovery automation; Graylog prioritizes detection and analysis over the post-breach remediation workflows that enterprise SOCs increasingly demand.

Graylog Graylog

Security teams at mid-market and enterprise organizations who need to cut investigation time will find Graylog Graylog's AI-powered threat detection and automated investigation capabilities faster than manual log hunting. The platform scores high on NIST DE.CM and DE.AE, meaning it prioritizes finding anomalies and characterizing them quickly, which matters when your analysts are already underwater. Skip this if your primary concern is incident response automation and recovery orchestration; Graylog excels at detection and analysis, not response workflows.