cyel Moving Target Security vs Goldilock TruAirgap™: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

cyel Moving Target Security

Mid-market and enterprise security teams protecting against lateral movement and persistent reconnaissance will get the most from cyel Moving Target Security because it makes your network topology unknowable to attackers without requiring infrastructure replacement. The SDN overlay deploys on top of existing networks, rotates per-transaction IP assignments and per-node encryption keys, and detects lateral movement by design rather than through pattern matching. Skip this if your priority is incident recovery and forensics; cyel is built for prevention and containment, not for providing the audit trail detail that mature SOCs lean on post-breach.

Goldilock TruAirgap™

Enterprise and mid-market teams protecting critical infrastructure or handling high-stakes third-party access will value Goldilock TruAirgap™ for its physical, out-of-band isolation that survives network compromise. The 12-port Layer 1 switching with non-IP management and SMS-based authentication means an attacker controlling your production network cannot flip a port without a separate, parallel command channel. The tool strengthens PR.IR capabilities by design; it's weak on RS.MI, so pair it with incident response automation rather than expecting TruAirgap™ to contain lateral movement on its own. Skip this if your threats are primarily application-layer or you lack dedicated infrastructure staff to manage per-port scheduling.