Byos Network Hardening vs cyel Moving Target Security: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Byos Network Hardening

Mid-market and enterprise teams running sensitive internal networks will want Byos Network Hardening to replace aging jump box architectures; its hardware-enforced microsegmentation eliminates the centralized bottleneck that makes jump boxes attractive targets for lateral movement. The Secure Edge appliance enforces isolation at OSI Layer 1–5, meaning a compromised workload can't phone home or pivot, and the controlled airgaps let you lock down during incidents without severing legitimate access entirely. Skip this if your network is primarily cloud-native and you're already compartmentalizing via VPCs and security groups; Byos is built for hybrid and on-premise environments where you can't rely on native cloud network controls.

cyel Moving Target Security

Mid-market and enterprise security teams protecting against lateral movement and persistent reconnaissance will get the most from cyel Moving Target Security because it makes your network topology unknowable to attackers without requiring infrastructure replacement. The SDN overlay deploys on top of existing networks, rotates per-transaction IP assignments and per-node encryption keys, and detects lateral movement by design rather than through pattern matching. Skip this if your priority is incident recovery and forensics; cyel is built for prevention and containment, not for providing the audit trail detail that mature SOCs lean on post-breach.