BluSapphire OnePlatform vs go-audit: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

BluSapphire OnePlatform

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in security data will see immediate value in BluSapphire OnePlatform's 98% data reduction through signal-based architecture, which actually cuts noise instead of just promising to. The federated edge processing and sub-2-minute MTTR on autonomous incident response mean you're not waiting for data to reach a central cloud tenant before containment starts. Skip this if your priority is recovery and forensics depth; BluSapphire is built for speed through detection and mitigation, not for the post-incident investigation rigor that some frameworks demand.

go-audit

Linux infrastructure teams managing high-volume audit logs will get the most from go-audit because it replaces auditd's brittle single-threaded daemon with a netlink-based architecture that doesn't drop events under load. The JSON output and pluggable pipeline design mean you can stream directly to your SIEM without parsing or custom connectors, saving weeks of integration work. Skip this if you need Windows or macOS audit collection or expect vendor support; go-audit is community-maintained and requires teams comfortable reading Go source code when things break.