Galah vs MokN Bait: 2026 Comparison
Galah is a free honeypots & deception tool. MokN Bait is a commercial honeypots & deception tool by MokN. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best honeypots & deception fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Security teams running resource-constrained detection labs or early-stage threat intelligence operations should deploy Galah for its speed; an LLM-powered honeypot that generates contextually plausible fake web services in minutes beats manual decoy setup by weeks. Free pricing and 638 GitHub stars indicate active community validation of the approach. Skip this if you need honeypots mimicking obscure legacy protocols or closed-source applications; Galah's strength is HTTP-layer deception, not breadth of application emulation.
Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in credential stuffing and password spray attacks need MokN Bait because it stops attackers at the moment they try stolen passwords, not weeks later in logs. Cloud deployment means no infrastructure work, and the zero false positive guarantee matters when your SOC is already understaffed; you get signal instead of noise. Skip this if your threat model is primarily external perimeter attacks rather than post-breach lateral movement, or if your team lacks basic credential hygiene to make decoy baits credible.
