FraudGuard vs Lunar: 2026 Comparison
FraudGuard is a free threat intelligence platforms tool. Lunar is a free threat intelligence platforms tool by Webz.io. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best threat intelligence platforms fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Fraud and abuse teams at SaaS platforms and marketplaces should pick FraudGuard for real-time IP reputation validation without the overhead of maintaining internal threat feeds. The free pricing model means you can deploy it immediately across login and transaction flows without budget cycles. Skip it if you need behavioral analysis or device fingerprinting; FraudGuard is traffic-first, not user-first.
Security teams managing breach aftermath and credential exposure across multiple domains should adopt Lunar for its real-time infostealer log intelligence, which surfaces compromised credentials faster than waiting for breach notifications. The platform ingests large-scale daily breach data and prioritizes service-level context for remediation, directly supporting the NIST Detect function of continuous monitoring and incident characterization. Skip this if you need post-compromise forensics or threat hunting beyond credential validation; Lunar is detection and alerting first, not investigation.
