FireCompass AI-powered Pen Testing vs Ironwood Cyber Enlight: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

FireCompass AI-powered Pen Testing

Security teams running lean with heavy third-party ecosystems should pick FireCompass AI-powered Pen Testing for its autonomous asset discovery and continuous red teaming without requiring constant manual scoping. The platform's shadow IT detection and daily delta reporting mean you catch new infrastructure vulnerabilities the day they appear, not months later in an annual pen test cycle. Skip this if your org needs a penetration testing vendor to also own your remediation workflow or if you prefer human-led assessments over AI-driven automation; FireCompass prioritizes attack surface coverage over guided remediation guidance.

Ironwood Cyber Enlight

Security teams responsible for validating whether their network can actually resist lateral movement and privilege escalation should run Ironwood Cyber Enlight; it simulates the full attack chain autonomously rather than stopping at vulnerability discovery. The platform covers ID.RA and DE.AE functions well, but NIST RS.AN (incident analysis and forensics) sits outside its scope, meaning it's built for continuous attack simulation and remediation validation, not incident response integration. Skip this if you need a tool that hunts active compromises or correlates findings across your existing detection stack.