FDsploit vs WSSiP: 2026 Comparison
FDsploit is a free penetration testing tool. WSSiP is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers running manual assessments against monolithic web applications will find FDsploit valuable for automating the tedious work of chaining file inclusion and directory traversal checks across parameter fuzzing. At 272 GitHub stars with active commit history, the tool has enough community validation to trust its exploitation logic without hand-rolling Python scripts yourself. Skip this if your scope includes modern APIs, microservices, or frameworks with built-in path normalization; FDsploit targets legacy code patterns that automated DAST tools often miss, which is exactly why it exists.
Penetration testers and AppSec engineers who need to manipulate WebSocket traffic during assessments will find WSSiP indispensable; it's the only free proxy that intercepts and rewrites Socket.IO messages without requiring protocol-level packet crafting. The 452 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal a tool actually used in real engagements, not abandoned ware. Skip this if you're looking for automated WebSocket vulnerability scanning; WSSiP is a manual testing instrument that demands you know what you're looking for.
