fatt vs Yaraprocessor: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
fatt is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Yaraprocessor is a free digital forensics and incident response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best digital forensics and incident response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Incident response teams who need to pivot quickly from packet captures to threat hunting will find fatt indispensable; it extracts JA3 and HASSH fingerprints that let you correlate C2 signatures across your full traffic history in minutes instead of hours. Free and 679 GitHub stars means it's already baked into most mature IR playbooks, lowering your team's time-to-triage on network-based indicators. Skip this if you're looking for packet analysis beyond metadata extraction or need a GUI; fatt is CLI-only and does one job well, which is exactly why it works.
Incident response teams performing post-breach packet analysis will find Yaraprocessor's dynamic payload scanning invaluable, especially when you need to apply YARA rules across network captures without rebuilding infrastructure. The free pricing and 98 GitHub stars signal active community use and zero licensing friction for resource-constrained security shops. Skip this if your team needs a polished UI or vendor support; Yaraprocessor is a command-line tool that assumes operator familiarity with YARA syntax and packet formats.
