@fastify/helmet vs Source Defense How it works: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

@fastify/helmet

Fastify teams building APIs that need HTTP header security without operational overhead should start with @fastify/helmet; it's a thin wrapper around the battle-tested helmet library, meaning you get OWASP Top 10 mitigations (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) with minimal configuration beyond `fastify.register()`. The 453 GitHub stars and zero-friction npm install make adoption frictionless for small-to-mid teams. Skip this if you need dynamic policy management, request-level header mutation, or centralized policy enforcement across multiple services; @fastify/helmet is intentionally static and Fastify-bound, not a gateway or orchestration tool.

Source Defense How it works

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing high-risk third-party vendor ecosystems should use Source Defense How it works for its two-line code deployment against Magecart and formjacking attacks that traditional WAFs miss entirely. The agentless SaaS model deploys in hours rather than weeks, and the machine learning-based access control actually enforces least-privilege vendor permissions at the client side, which maps directly to GV.SC supply chain controls. This tool prioritizes real-time prevention over forensics, so organizations needing deep historical breach analysis or incident response workflows should look elsewhere.