external_c2 framework vs pybof: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
external_c2 framework is a free offensive security tool. pybof is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and adversary simulation teams building custom C2 infrastructure will find external_c2 framework valuable for its direct implementation of Cobalt Strike's External C2 spec, eliminating the need to reverse-engineer data transfer protocols. The framework's 241 GitHub stars and active Python codebase reflect real operational use, though you're building from scratch here; this is for teams comfortable writing their own interfaces rather than buying turnkey C2 solutions. Skip this if your team needs GUI-driven campaign management or offboarding flexibility; external_c2 assumes you want control and customization over ease of use.
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to execute custom BOFs without touching disk will find PyBOF essential for post-exploitation work; it's the only Python-native option for in-memory Beacon Object File execution, letting you skip Cobalt Strike's GUI entirely and automate payloads programmatically. The 80 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal real adoption among operators, not just theoretical interest. Skip this if you're looking for evasion magic; PyBOF assumes you've already got execution and focuses narrowly on loading and running BOFs, which means your success depends entirely on the quality of the BOF itself and your network position.
