enum4linux-ng vs LaZagne Project: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
enum4linux-ng is a free penetration testing tool. LaZagne Project is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red team operators running Windows reconnaissance on networks with SMB exposure will move faster with enum4linux-ng than the original enum4linux, thanks to its Python rewrite that handles larger datasets and broken SMB implementations without hanging. The tool pulls user lists, share enumeration, and policy details from a single command line faster than manual net use or rpcclient chains, which matters when you're working through dozens of targets in a single engagement. Skip this if your scope is macOS or Linux-heavy environments where SMB isn't the attack surface; enum4linux-ng is deliberately Windows-centric and won't justify the learning curve otherwise.
Penetration testers and red team operators conducting post-exploitation assessments need LaZagne Project for its breadth of credential extraction across 30+ applications and operating systems in a single pass. The tool's 10,713 GitHub stars and active maintenance reflect genuine adoption in offensive security workflows where speed matters more than stealth. This is not a fit for organizations seeking continuous endpoint monitoring; LaZagne is explicitly designed for one-time local execution during authorized engagements, not persistent credential discovery.
