enum4linux-ng vs GCPBucketBrute: 2026 Comparison
enum4linux-ng is a free penetration testing tool. GCPBucketBrute is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers and red team operators running Windows reconnaissance on networks with SMB exposure will move faster with enum4linux-ng than the original enum4linux, thanks to its Python rewrite that handles larger datasets and broken SMB implementations without hanging. The tool pulls user lists, share enumeration, and policy details from a single command line faster than manual net use or rpcclient chains, which matters when you're working through dozens of targets in a single engagement. Skip this if your scope is macOS or Linux-heavy environments where SMB isn't the attack surface; enum4linux-ng is deliberately Windows-centric and won't justify the learning curve otherwise.
Penetration testers auditing Google Cloud environments need GCPBucketBrute to quickly surface misconfigurations that automated scanners routinely miss. With 558 GitHub stars and active community use, the tool's enumeration logic catches overly permissive bucket policies faster than manual checks or generic cloud scanners. Skip this if your team lacks GCP infrastructure or needs post-exploitation privilege mapping; GCPBucketBrute is strictly a reconnaissance and access-validation tool, not a full exploitation framework.
