Common Fate vs Entitle Cloud Permissions Management: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Common Fate

Mid-market and enterprise teams running AWS or GCP will find the most value in Common Fate's time-bound access model, which eliminates standing privileges without the operational friction of traditional PAM. The platform's Policy-as-Code approach and automated workflows tied to on-call systems mean your engineers spend less time in access requests and your security team audits fewer dormant accounts. Skip this if you need unified PAM across multiple cloud providers or on-premises infrastructure; Common Fate is deliberately cloud-native and won't stretch beyond AWS and GCP.

Entitle Cloud Permissions Management

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing cloud infrastructure across multiple providers will get the most from Entitle Cloud Permissions Management because it eliminates standing permissions without the approval bottlenecks that kill developer velocity. JIT access provisioning with self-service requests and delegated workflows cuts access lifetime from days to minutes while keeping audit trails that satisfy SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance. Skip this if your organization runs mostly on-premises systems or needs deep privileged session recording; Entitle is built for cloud-first shops that treat least privilege as non-negotiable.