Cato Networks ZTNA vs Enclave: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cato Networks ZTNA: Cloud-based ZTNA solution for secure remote access to applications. built by Cato Networks. Core capabilities include Identity verification and multi-factor authentication, Policy-based access control using user identity, location, and device posture, Network microsegmentation with software-defined security perimeters..

Enclave: ZTNA platform replacing VPNs with direct, policy-driven encrypted connectivity. built by Enclave. Core capabilities include Direct peer-to-peer device connectivity without VPN servers or open firewall ports, Cloud-based visual policy engine for defining and managing access controls, Automatic end-to-end encryption for all connections..

Both serve the Zero Trust Network Access market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

Cato Networks ZTNA differentiates with Identity verification and multi-factor authentication, Policy-based access control using user identity, location, and device posture, Network microsegmentation with software-defined security perimeters. Enclave differentiates with Direct peer-to-peer device connectivity without VPN servers or open firewall ports, Cloud-based visual policy engine for defining and managing access controls, Automatic end-to-end encryption for all connections.

Cato Networks ZTNA is developed by Cato Networks. Enclave is developed by Enclave. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

Cato Networks ZTNA and Enclave serve similar Zero Trust Network Access use cases: both are Zero Trust Network Access tools, both cover ZTNA, Remote Access, Microsegmentation. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.