Egress Protect vs INKY Email Encryption: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Egress Protect

Mid-market and enterprise teams protecting sensitive data in Microsoft 365 should choose Egress Protect for its post-send message control, which lets you revoke access and restrict forwarding even after recipients open encrypted email. The tool covers three NIST CSF 2.0 functions (PR.DS, PR.AA, DE.CM), with particular strength in access enforcement through granular controls and continuous audit trails that satisfy compliance auditors. Skip this if you need unified DLP across cloud storage, web, and endpoints; Egress Protect is email-centric and won't replace a platform-wide data loss prevention strategy.

INKY Email Encryption

SMB and mid-market teams drowning in email-borne data exfiltration will get real value from INKY Email Encryption because it bundles encryption with behavioral threat detection in one platform instead of forcing you to stitch two vendors together. The tool covers NIST PR.DS data security and PR.PS platform security, meaning it actually enforces encryption at rest and in transit while catching the anomalous send patterns that slip past traditional gateways. Skip this if your organization needs a standalone encryption appliance for highly regulated industries with air-gapped requirements; INKY's cloud-first architecture and tight Microsoft 365/Google Workspace coupling assume modern SaaS environments, not legacy on-prem mail servers.