DryRun Security AppSec Agents vs Keyscope: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
DryRun Security AppSec Agents is a commercial static application security testing tool by DryRun Security. Keyscope is a free static application security testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best static application security testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Development teams shipping code at startup and mid-market velocity need DryRun Security AppSec Agents to stop spending engineering time triaging false positives from rule-based SAST. Its AI-driven detection reasoning cuts noise by actually explaining exploitability rather than flagging every code pattern, and the pull request-native workflow means security happens where developers already work, not in a separate scanning queue. Skip this if your org needs policy enforcement across sensitive file changes as a hard gate; the allowed authors feature exists but this tool prioritizes finding real bugs over access control workflows.
DevOps and security teams hunting leaked credentials in their codebase or infrastructure need Keyscope because it validates secrets across 30+ providers in a single pass, cutting through the noise of false positives that plague generic secret scanners. The tool runs free and exports findings to JSON or CSV, letting you integrate it directly into CI/CD without licensing friction. Skip this if you need post-detection remediation workflows or automated secret rotation; Keyscope finds and validates, then stops.
