drydock vs Plexicus Container Security: 2026 Comparison
drydock is a free container security tool. Plexicus Container Security is a commercial container security tool by Plexicus. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best container security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
DevOps teams running Docker in CI/CD pipelines need Drydock because it audits container images against CIS benchmarks before they hit production, catching misconfigurations that scanners miss. The tool ships with customizable profiles and JSON output, so you can integrate it directly into your build process without manual remediation work. Skip this if your organization requires a graphical dashboard or runtime monitoring; Drydock is audit-focused and doesn't track container behavior after deployment.
Teams building containerized applications on tight budgets should evaluate Plexicus Container Security for its runtime threat detection and automated response capabilities, which catch post-deployment attacks that image scanning alone misses. The platform covers the full shift-left-to-runtime arc with hardcoded secrets detection, CVE scanning, Kubernetes policy enforcement, and continuous monitoring, mapping to NIST ID.RA and DE.CM functions most buyers actually need. Skip this if you're looking for a broader CNAPP that handles cloud infrastructure or VMs; Plexicus stays focused on containers and Kubernetes, which is exactly why smaller teams without dedicated platform security engineers will move faster with it.
