Dragos OT Incident Response vs Gyala Agger: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Dragos OT Incident Response

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams will get the most from Dragos OT Incident Response because it treats ICS incident response as a distinct discipline rather than bolting detection onto IT playbooks; the WorldView threat intelligence with weekly Knowledge Packs and expert-authored playbooks mean your analysts aren't improvising response procedures for unfamiliar environments. The platform covers the full arc from continuous monitoring through case management and forensic reconstruction, anchored by NIST Detect and Response functions that actually matter in control system emergencies. Skip this if your priority is prevention rather than forensics; Dragos prioritizes investigation depth over blocking at ingress.

Gyala Agger

Mid-market and enterprise operations teams defending both IT and OT environments need Gyala Agger because it actually sees legacy and air-gapped networks that mainstream EDR platforms ignore. Its behavioral anomaly detection runs on operational state models rather than signature patterns, which matters when you're protecting systems that can't be patched or rebooted. The caveat: Gyala prioritizes detection and response speed over the forensics and recovery depth that mature SOCs demand; if your incident response workflow depends on weeks of historical correlation and root cause analysis, you'll outgrow this tool quickly.