Donut vs Log-Killer: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Donut is a free red-team & adversary emulation tool. Log-Killer is a free red-team & adversary emulation tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best red-team & adversary emulation fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to deliver .NET and PE payloads that evade memory-scanning EDR will find Donut essential; it generates position-independent shellcode that executes directly from memory without touching disk, eliminating the most common detection vector. With 4,492 GitHub stars and active community contributions, the tool has been battle-tested across real engagements and stays current with Windows API changes. Skip this if you're looking for post-exploitation frameworks with built-in C2 capability or if your scope is limited to external reconnaissance; Donut is narrowly focused on the injection problem and assumes you already have payload delivery sorted.
Red teamers and penetration testers running Linux/Windows infrastructure will find Log-Killer valuable for post-exploitation cleanup; its zero-dependency design and 314 GitHub stars reflect active adoption in offensive workflows where log deletion speed matters more than stealth sophistication. The free pricing eliminates procurement friction for contractors and small security firms validating evasion tactics. Skip this if you need forensic-resistant deletion or cross-platform coverage beyond Linux and Windows; Log-Killer prioritizes simplicity over operational security hardening.
