docem vs Pentesting Payloads: 2026 Comparison
docem is a free penetration testing tool. Pentesting Payloads is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers who need to quickly validate XXE and XSS vulnerabilities across multiple file formats will move faster with docem than hand-crafting payloads. The tool's free pricing and 639 GitHub stars reflect active adoption among red teamers who value speed over breadth; docem does payload injection well and stays out of your way. Skip this if you're looking for a full-stack pentest framework or something that handles SSRF, CSRF, and other injection types in one tool; docem is deliberately narrow.
Pentesters at startups and small consultancies running time-constrained assessments will move fastest with Pentesting Payloads; the web-based payload library eliminates the friction of hunting, encoding, and formatting exploits across SQLi, XSS, LFI, and command injection vectors. It's free and cloud-deployed, so there's no infrastructure lift. Skip this if you need payload generation tied to active reconnaissance data or custom encoding chains; Pentesting Payloads is a static reference tool, not an exploitation framework.
