Do Not Disturb vs Rootkit Hunter: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Do Not Disturb is a free endpoint detection and response tool. Rootkit Hunter is a free endpoint detection and response tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best endpoint detection and response fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mac-only security teams with sparse IT budgets should pick Do Not Disturb for its single, well-executed function: catching when someone physically tampers with an unattended laptop. The tool detects unauthorized access attempts through simple file system monitoring, costs nothing, and has been validated by 312 GitHub stars from practitioners who've actually deployed it. Skip this if you need EDR breadth,network detection, process monitoring, threat hunting,or if your fleet runs Windows or Linux; Do Not Disturb is intentionally narrow, solving one problem that most commercial EDR products don't prioritize at all.
Unix administrators managing legacy systems or air-gapped environments need Rootkit Hunter for its signature-based rootkit detection without requiring agent infrastructure or cloud connectivity. The tool runs entirely offline and catches kernel-level compromises that network-based detection misses, making it valuable for NIST Identify and Detect functions in stripped-down environments. Skip this if you're running modern Linux distributions with SELinux and need real-time behavioral monitoring; Rootkit Hunter is scan-based and reactive, not preventive, and won't replace EDR for active threat hunting or rapid response.
