Cybersentriq Advanced Phishing Protection vs EAST Anti-Phishing Tool: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Cybersentriq Advanced Phishing Protection

SMB and mid-market teams defending Microsoft 365 environments should consider Cybersentriq Advanced Phishing Protection as a focused gap-filler when native Exchange Defender isn't catching enough spear phishing and credential harvesting attempts. The NLP-based intent analysis and Link Lock post-click protection address detection and response more thoroughly than Microsoft's baseline offering, and the tool maps cleanly to NIST DE.CM and DE.AE functions that most organizations still underinvest in. Skip this if you need DLP as a primary function rather than an ancillary feature, or if your email infrastructure lives outside Microsoft 365.

EAST Anti-Phishing Tool

Microsoft 365 administrators managing credential phishing at organizations under 5,000 users will find real value in EAST Anti-Phishing Tool because the CSS-based deployment model actually stops phishing pages from rendering correctly on your own login portal, blocking the attack before users even type credentials. The free model with no per-seat licensing means you get Entra-native protection without budget negotiation; deployment takes under an hour through the portal interface. Skip this if your environment runs hybrid identity systems outside pure Entra or if you need detection and response capabilities beyond the login page itself.