CrackMapExec (CME) vs Synack Sara: 2026 Comparison
CrackMapExec (CME) is a free penetration testing tool. Synack Sara is a commercial penetration testing tool by Synack. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Red teamers and penetration testers running internal network assessments will get the most from CrackMapExec because it maps Active Directory relationships and credential paths faster than manual enumeration, cutting reconnaissance time from hours to minutes. The tool's ability to chain compromised credentials across Windows hosts in a single pass is why it remains standard in post-exploitation workflows across thousands of engagements. Skip this if your team needs a polished UI or vendor support; CrackMapExec is a command-line tool maintained by the community, and its learning curve assumes you already understand NTLM relay attacks and Kerberos delegation.
Security teams drowning in scan results will cut through the noise fastest with Synack Sara, which filters exploitable vulnerabilities from false positives through autonomous pentest logic rather than forcing analysts to triage manually. A 2-3 day time-to-value with AI testing in hours and human validation in days beats the standard 6-8 week pentest cycle, and the 75% cost reduction per engagement is real when you're running quarterly assessments across mid-market or enterprise infrastructure. Skip this if you need continuous runtime detection or prioritize speed over validation; Sara's strength is confidence in findings, not coverage velocity, and that human handoff means you're still waiting days for the final report.
