Core Security Cobalt Strike vs Katana: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Core Security Cobalt Strike is a commercial offensive security tool by Core Security. Katana is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise red teams running structured adversary emulation programs should pick Core Security Cobalt Strike for its Malleable C2 profiles, which let you authentically simulate APT tradecraft without building custom infrastructure from scratch. The Arsenal Kit's Sleep Mask and reflective loader customizations give you the payload flexibility needed to stay ahead of defensive signatures in mature environments. Skip this if your team lacks the operator experience to tune these features; Cobalt Strike demands thoughtful configuration, not point-and-click execution.
Security teams running reconnaissance workflows or building custom crawling pipelines will get the most from Katana; the 14K GitHub stars reflect genuine adoption by practitioners who need fine-grained control over spidering logic rather than point-and-click scanners. The framework approach means you're writing code to extract what matters to your target scope, which beats generic crawlers for complex authentication flows or JavaScript-heavy applications. Skip this if your team lacks engineering resources or needs a managed SaaS interface; Katana requires Python knowledge and infrastructure to operationalize.
