CloudMask End-to-End Encryption vs DataStealth: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

CloudMask End-to-End Encryption: E2EE solution for emails, files & SaaS apps with user-held encryption keys. built by CloudMask. Core capabilities include End-to-end encryption for emails, files, and SaaS application data, User-controlled encryption keys stored only on user devices, never transmitted, One-click encryption via CloudMask Lock button within existing applications..

DataStealth: Inline data protection platform for on-prem, legacy, hybrid & cloud envs. built by DataStealth. Core capabilities include Real-time agentless data discovery and classification across databases, files, APIs, SaaS, and event streams, Inline data masking, tokenization, and encryption applied as data flows, Coverage for on-premises, cloud, hybrid, legacy, mainframe, and air-gapped systems..

Both serve the Data Masking market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.

CloudMask End-to-End Encryption differentiates with End-to-end encryption for emails, files, and SaaS application data, User-controlled encryption keys stored only on user devices, never transmitted, One-click encryption via CloudMask Lock button within existing applications. DataStealth differentiates with Real-time agentless data discovery and classification across databases, files, APIs, SaaS, and event streams, Inline data masking, tokenization, and encryption applied as data flows, Coverage for on-premises, cloud, hybrid, legacy, mainframe, and air-gapped systems.

CloudMask End-to-End Encryption is developed by CloudMask. DataStealth is developed by DataStealth. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.

CloudMask End-to-End Encryption and DataStealth serve similar Data Masking use cases: both are Data Masking tools, both cover Encryption. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.