ClearVector Sensor vs Falco: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
ClearVector Sensor is a commercial container security tool by ClearVector. Falco is a free container security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best container security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise teams running containerized workloads across Kubernetes, ECS, or EKS will get the most from ClearVector Sensor because it attributes runtime activity to specific identities and workloads instead of just flagging suspicious behavior. The eBPF-based architecture runs with minimal resource overhead while supporting both AMD64 and ARM64, and the interactive command tracing through SSH, SSM, and ECS exec gives forensics teams the identity context most runtime sensors lack. This tool prioritizes detection and investigation over automated response; it won't help if you need out-of-the-box remediation or policy enforcement built in.
DevOps and platform engineering teams managing Kubernetes clusters on a budget will get the most from Falco; its syscall-level kernel monitoring catches runtime anomalies that signature-based tools miss, and the CNCF graduation status means you're adopting what mature teams already run at scale. The free pricing removes procurement friction for teams piloting runtime security or standardizing across multiple clusters. Skip Falco if you need out-of-the-box response automation or a managed SaaS; tuning detection rules and operationalizing alerts requires engineering bandwidth that smaller security teams often don't have.
