Claroty xDome Secure Access vs Systancia Zero Trust: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Claroty xDome Secure Access

Enterprise and mid-market teams managing industrial control systems or healthcare devices will get the most from Claroty xDome Secure Access because it treats CPS asset discovery and exposure mapping as a prerequisite to access control, not an afterthought. The platform covers ID.AM and PR.AA across NIST CSF 2.0, meaning you get genuine asset inventory before you lock down who touches what, and the hybrid deployment model handles both air-gapped and connected environments without requiring full network redesigns. Skip this if your priority is detection speed over access prevention; xDome's strength is keeping unauthorized users off the network entirely, not catching them after they're in.

Systancia Zero Trust

Mid-market and enterprise teams managing both IT and OT infrastructure will find real value in Systancia Zero Trust because it handles privileged access across both domains without forcing separate platforms. The product's support for AD-tiered architecture and session recording directly addresses NIST PR.AA access control requirements that most zero trust vendors only half-solve for OT environments. Skip this if your organization runs cloud-native infrastructure exclusively or needs deep integration with identity providers beyond Active Directory; Systancia is built for hybrid environments where legacy systems aren't going anywhere.