Cisco Umbrella vs Cato SSE 360: 2026 Comparison
Cisco Umbrella is a free security service edge tool. Cato SSE 360 is a commercial security service edge tool by Cato Networks. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best security service edge fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams deploying Cisco Umbrella should expect a cloud-first DNS and proxy layer that stops malware and phishing at the perimeter before traffic reaches your network. The platform blocks 97% of known malicious domains on first contact and integrates directly with Cisco's SD-WAN fabric, eliminating the need for separate appliances at branch offices. Skip this if your threat model demands on-premises inspection, deep packet analysis, or native integration with non-Cisco network infrastructure; Umbrella trades granular visibility for deployment speed and operational simplicity.
Mid-market and enterprise teams replacing point security tools with a single cloud-native platform will get the most from Cato SSE 360, especially if WAN optimization and traffic steering matter as much as threat prevention. Its Single Pass Cloud Engine processes SWG, CASB, DLP, and ZTNA inspection in one pass across a private global backbone, cutting both latency and policy complexity. Skip this if your organization needs depth in DLP fingerprinting or forensic recovery; Cato prioritizes access control and continuous monitoring over data loss investigation.
