Centrl Privacy360 vs OneTrust Privacy Operations: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Centrl Privacy360

Privacy teams at mid-market and enterprise companies managing sprawling data inventories across multiple jurisdictions will see immediate value in Centrl Privacy360's native connector-based data mapping; it cuts the month-long spreadsheet phase that kills most privacy programs. The platform covers all six NIST GV and ID functions, meaning it enforces policy alignment from risk strategy through asset inventory and assessment, which is where most privacy tools go slack. Skip this if your organization is still treating privacy as a compliance checkbox rather than embedding it into how you actually govern data; Centrl requires stakeholders to own their data flows, not just check boxes.

OneTrust Privacy Operations

Privacy teams at mid-market and enterprise companies drowning in spreadsheet-based compliance workflows will get immediate value from OneTrust Privacy Operations because it actually automates the tedious parts: asset discovery across your stack, data flow mapping, and RoPA generation that usually take months and kill headcount. The platform covers six NIST CSF 2.0 functions including asset management and risk assessment, which means it handles both the discovery and governance sides most privacy shops struggle with separately. Skip this if your organization hasn't yet inventoried where personal data lives; you need that baseline before automation makes sense, and OneTrust will surface problems you're not ready to solve.