Ceeyu Digital Questionnaires for TPRM vs Vulneri TPRM: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Ceeyu Digital Questionnaires for TPRM

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing vendor risk at scale need a questionnaire platform that doesn't force you to rebuild assessment logic from scratch, and Ceeyu Digital Questionnaires for TPRM handles that through parent-child question relationships and a built-in library mapped to CIS, NIS, NIST, and ISO frameworks. The platform covers NIST CSF 2.0's GV.SC supply chain and ID.AM asset management functions directly, with automated scoring and periodic reassessment scheduling that actually reduces the manual overhead teams complain about. Skip this if you need integrated threat intelligence feeds or deep correlation across your own internal vulnerabilities and third-party risk scores; Ceeyu excels at structuring the assessment process itself, not at rolling risk signals into a unified view.

Vulneri TPRM

Mid-market and enterprise security teams with 50+ vendors need Vulneri TPRM for its non-intrusive API-based monitoring that actually runs continuous assessments without sending questionnaires every quarter. The platform maps your full third-party ecosystem, classifies by criticality, and feeds compliance evidence directly into audit workflows, cutting the manual overhead that kills most TPRM programs. Smaller organizations or teams with fewer than 20 vendors will find this overbuilt; a basic vendor scorecard bolted onto your existing GRC tool will suffice until your supply chain complexity justifies the investment.