Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Cato Networks Cato SWG (Secure Web Gateway) is a commercial security service edge tool by Cato Networks. Rawstream Endpoint Agent is a commercial security service edge tool by Rawstream. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best security service edge fit for your security stack.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Cato Networks Cato SWG (Secure Web Gateway)
Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing distributed workforces will benefit most from Cato Networks Cato SWG because its identity and device-posture-based policies actually enforce different rules per user rather than per network perimeter. The built-in Data Lake and event query engine eliminate the need for a separate SIEM just to investigate web traffic, and granular TLS decryption lets you catch threats in encrypted channels without the performance tax of standalone appliances. Skip this if your organization needs network segmentation or east-west traffic control; Cato SWG is web gateway only, not a full SASE fabric replacement.
Mid-market and SMB security teams managing distributed workforces will get the most from Rawstream Endpoint Agent because its local proxy-based filtering works equally well on-network and off-network without requiring constant cloud callbacks. Active Directory integration and Citrix support mean you can deploy it across hybrid environments without rearchitecting your identity layer, and real-time bandwidth tracking gives you actual visibility into what's consuming your pipe instead of guesses. Skip this if you need endpoint detection and response capabilities; Rawstream is content filtering and application monitoring, not threat hunting.
Cloud-based SWG providing web filtering, threat protection, and policy enforcement
Endpoint agent providing web filtering and app monitoring on/off network
Access NIST CSF 2.0 data from thousands of security products via MCP to assess your stack coverage.
Access via MCPNo reviews yet
No reviews yet
Explore more tools in this category or create a security stack with your selections.
Common questions about comparing Cato Networks Cato SWG (Secure Web Gateway) vs Rawstream Endpoint Agent for your security service edge needs.
Cato Networks Cato SWG (Secure Web Gateway): Cloud-based SWG providing web filtering, threat protection, and policy enforcement. built by Cato Networks. Core capabilities include Pre-configured security policies aligned with best practices, 80+ website classification categories, Malicious domain blacklist with automatic updates..
Rawstream Endpoint Agent: Endpoint agent providing web filtering and app monitoring on/off network. built by Rawstream. Core capabilities include Local HTTP/S proxy-based web filtering, 80+ domain categories for content filtering, Block/allow lists with wildcard support..
Both serve the Security Service Edge market but differ in approach, feature depth, and target audience.
Cato Networks Cato SWG (Secure Web Gateway) differentiates with Pre-configured security policies aligned with best practices, 80+ website classification categories, Malicious domain blacklist with automatic updates. Rawstream Endpoint Agent differentiates with Local HTTP/S proxy-based web filtering, 80+ domain categories for content filtering, Block/allow lists with wildcard support.
Cato Networks Cato SWG (Secure Web Gateway) is developed by Cato Networks. Rawstream Endpoint Agent is developed by Rawstream. Vendor maturity, funding stage, and team size can be important factors when evaluating long-term viability and support quality.
Cato Networks Cato SWG (Secure Web Gateway) and Rawstream Endpoint Agent serve similar Security Service Edge use cases: both are Security Service Edge tools, both cover Content Filtering. Review the feature comparison above to determine which fits your requirements.
Get strategic cybersecurity insights in your inbox