Burp-LFI-tests vs FuzzDB: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Burp-LFI-tests is a free penetration testing tool. FuzzDB is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: we never sell rankings.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers who need to systematically test for Local File Inclusion flaws will find Burp-LFI-tests valuable because it consolidates proven LFI payloads and exploitation chains into a Burp extension, cutting manual payload crafting time during assessments. The tool is free and maintained on GitHub with solid community engagement, removing cost friction from your toolkit. This is not a replacement for manual testing or general vulnerability scanning; it's narrowly built for LFI-focused work, so teams expecting broad web vulnerability coverage or automated exploitation should look elsewhere.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need fast, offline fuzzing dictionaries without vendor lock-in should start with FuzzDB; its 8,848 GitHub stars reflect real adoption among practitioners who value a lightweight, freely distributable wordlist over commercial fuzz tools. The open-source attack patterns cover predictable paths, parameter names, and injection vectors that catch low-hanging misconfigurations in web apps and APIs before they reach production. Skip this if your team expects guided workflows or integrated vulnerability scanning; FuzzDB is a raw dictionary, not a full testing platform.
