Burp-LFI-tests vs FuzzDB: 2026 Comparison
Burp-LFI-tests is a free penetration testing tool. FuzzDB is a free penetration testing tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best penetration testing fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Penetration testers who need to systematically test for Local File Inclusion flaws will find Burp-LFI-tests valuable because it consolidates proven LFI payloads and exploitation chains into a Burp extension, cutting manual payload crafting time during assessments. The tool is free and maintained on GitHub with solid community engagement, removing cost friction from your toolkit. This is not a replacement for manual testing or general vulnerability scanning; it's narrowly built for LFI-focused work, so teams expecting broad web vulnerability coverage or automated exploitation should look elsewhere.
Penetration testers and red teamers who need fast, offline fuzzing dictionaries without vendor lock-in should start with FuzzDB; its 8,848 GitHub stars reflect real adoption among practitioners who value a lightweight, freely distributable wordlist over commercial fuzz tools. The open-source attack patterns cover predictable paths, parameter names, and injection vectors that catch low-hanging misconfigurations in web apps and APIs before they reach production. Skip this if your team expects guided workflows or integrated vulnerability scanning; FuzzDB is a raw dictionary, not a full testing platform.
