BinaryAnalysisPlatform (BAP) vs GrammaTech DDisasm: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

GrammaTech DDisasm

Reverse engineers and incident responders analyzing malware or firmware need DDisasm when binary instrumentation demands reassemblable code; its Datalog-driven disassembly rules catch function boundaries and symbolization patterns that linear disassemblers miss, and the GTIRB intermediate representation output lets you pipe results into custom analysis pipelines without manual translation. Skip this if your team needs GUI-driven interactive debugging or handles primarily x86-64 user-space binaries where IDA Pro's existing plugins already work; DDisasm shines on embedded architectures and cases where you're building automation around disassembly, not clicking through a debugger.