BBT.live BeBroadband as a Service Platform vs SysteCom SASE: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

BBT.live BeBroadband as a Service Platform

Service provider security teams managing distributed branch networks will get the most from BBT.live BeBroadband as a Service Platform because it combines WAN optimization with Check Point intrusion protection in a single orchestrator, eliminating the overhead of bolting security onto commodity SD-WAN. Zero-touch provisioning and multi-tenancy support mean you actually deploy this at scale without doubling your ops headcount. The tradeoff is real though: this is purpose-built for carriers and MSPs; if you're an enterprise buying directly for internal branches, you're paying for multi-tenant features you don't need and missing the vertical integrations that make the economics work.

SysteCom SASE

Mid-market and SMB teams moving away from appliance-heavy network security will find SysteCom SASE's single-agent deployment model genuinely useful for managing both managed and unmanaged devices without multiplying your tech stack. The platform covers the core SASE pillars,SWG, CASB, ZTNA, and DLP,through one console, which cuts the operational drag of bolting together point products. Skip this if you need forensic-grade incident response or advanced threat hunting; SysteCom prioritizes access control and data visibility over post-breach investigation, and the vendor's 21-person team means you're betting on a smaller operation for long-term roadmap execution.