AVEVA vs ICS-pcap: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
AVEVA is a free industrial control system security tool. ICS-pcap is a free industrial control system security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best industrial control system security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Operations teams managing critical infrastructure across oil, gas, power, or manufacturing will get the most from AVEVA for embedding security controls into engineering workflows rather than bolting them on afterward. The platform's native integration with industrial design and asset management tools means security constraints land during project planning, not during commissioning when change costs spike. This is not the right fit for teams needing standalone threat detection or incident response; AVEVA prioritizes prevention through design governance, leaving you to layer detection separately.
ICS security teams building detection labs or training incident responders should use ICS-pcap as a reference library for actual industrial protocol traffic; the 542 GitHub stars and active contributor model means you're working with real packet captures instead of synthetic data. The tool's value sits entirely in NIST Identify and Detect functions, giving you baseline signatures and anomaly patterns for MODBUS, Profinet, and DNP3, but it won't help you with response automation or recovery orchestration. Skip this if you need a commercial PCAP repository with vendor support or a turnkey IDS; ICS-pcap is a free practitioner resource that only pays off if your team has the bandwidth to ingest and operationalize the captures themselves.
