AVEVA vs Citicus ICS: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
AVEVA is a free industrial control system security tool. Citicus ICS is a commercial industrial control system security tool by Citicus. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best industrial control system security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, company size fit, deployment model, here is our conclusion:
Operations teams managing critical infrastructure across oil, gas, power, or manufacturing will get the most from AVEVA for embedding security controls into engineering workflows rather than bolting them on afterward. The platform's native integration with industrial design and asset management tools means security constraints land during project planning, not during commissioning when change costs spike. This is not the right fit for teams needing standalone threat detection or incident response; AVEVA prioritizes prevention through design governance, leaving you to layer detection separately.
Mid-market and enterprise operators managing SCADA, DCS, or PLC environments should choose Citicus ICS if your team lacks a structured, ICS-native approach to risk quantification and remediation tracking. The platform's five-factor risk scorecard and PDCA lifecycle directly address NIST CSF 2.0 Risk Assessment and Risk Management Strategy, with configurable controls mapped to CPNI and NIST 800-82, which matters when regulators audit your control baselines. Skip this if you're a small site with minimal ICS complexity or need real-time threat detection alongside your risk scoring; Citicus is governance and planning, not operational alerting.
