AVEVA vs Gambit KnightGuard for OT & Critical Infra: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AVEVA

Operations teams managing critical infrastructure across oil, gas, power, or manufacturing will get the most from AVEVA for embedding security controls into engineering workflows rather than bolting them on afterward. The platform's native integration with industrial design and asset management tools means security constraints land during project planning, not during commissioning when change costs spike. This is not the right fit for teams needing standalone threat detection or incident response; AVEVA prioritizes prevention through design governance, leaving you to layer detection separately.

Gambit KnightGuard for OT & Critical Infra

Mid-market and enterprise OT teams managing legacy industrial systems without dedicated threat intelligence will find real value in Gambit KnightGuard for OT & Critical Infra because it consolidates threat-informed defense and continuous monitoring in a single platform rather than forcing you to stitch together separate CTI tools and asset scanners. The hybrid deployment model and strong coverage across NIST ID.RA and DE.CM functions mean you actually get visibility into anomalies without ripping out critical infrastructure to add agents. Skip this if your organization already has mature threat intelligence operations and just needs a narrow detection layer; Gambit's strength is for teams that need the intelligence and monitoring together, not for bolt-on deployments.