AttackRuleMap vs IriusRisk Threat Modeling Tool: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AttackRuleMap

Startup security teams building threat models from scratch should use AttackRuleMap to connect MITRE ATT&CK techniques directly to testable atomic actions, compressing what usually takes weeks of manual mapping into hours. The tool is free and cloud-deployed, removing budget and infrastructure friction at the stage where most startups can't afford a dedicated threat modeling platform. Skip this if your team needs automated detection rules or response playbooks; AttackRuleMap is a planning and validation tool, not an operational security control.

IriusRisk Threat Modeling Tool

Development teams building new products or platforms should start with IriusRisk Threat Modeling Tool because its diagramming interface actually gets developers to model threats before writing code, not after as a compliance checkbox. The library of 700+ components with pre-mapped threats and controls means a junior engineer can identify design flaws that would normally require a senior architect's review. Skip this if your org needs threat modeling integrated into CI/CD gates or connected to your existing AppSec toolchain; IriusRisk is strongest when used as a standalone design phase exercise, not as a continuous scanning layer.