AttackRuleMap vs IriusRisk Threat Modeling Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

AttackRuleMap

Startup security teams building threat models from scratch should use AttackRuleMap to connect MITRE ATT&CK techniques directly to testable atomic actions, compressing what usually takes weeks of manual mapping into hours. The tool is free and cloud-deployed, removing budget and infrastructure friction at the stage where most startups can't afford a dedicated threat modeling platform. Skip this if your team needs automated detection rules or response playbooks; AttackRuleMap is a planning and validation tool, not an operational security control.

IriusRisk Threat Modeling Platform

Product and application security teams building cloud-native architectures need IriusRisk Threat Modeling Platform to catch design-phase vulnerabilities before they reach code, which is where threat modeling actually prevents costly rewrites. The platform's automated threat generation across software architectures and supply chain risk visibility directly address NIST GV.SC, cutting the manual effort that makes most teams skip threat modeling altogether. Skip this if your organization treats threat modeling as a compliance checkbox rather than a design discipline; IriusRisk assumes you'll act on what it finds.