Atera Network Discovery vs Trickest Vulnerability Scanning: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Atera Network Discovery

SMB and mid-market IT teams already running Atera's RMM will find genuine value in Network Discovery because it eliminates the separate tool tax for basic asset inventory and CVE scanning. The NMAP-powered scanning integrates directly into your existing RMM workflows, cutting the overhead of maintaining a standalone vulnerability scanner. Where it falls short is in forensic depth; this is asset discovery and port-based CVE detection, not a replacement for active vulnerability assessment tools like Nessus or Qualys that fingerprint software versions and test exploitability. Worth deploying if you need continuous visibility into what's connecting to your network. Not worth it if you're already committed to a dedicated CVSS-scoring vulnerability platform.

Trickest Vulnerability Scanning

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing sprawling infrastructure and application portfolios need scanning that doesn't force you into rigid templates; Trickest Vulnerability Scanning lets you build custom workflows around your actual risk priorities instead of the vendor's assumptions. Its hyperscalable execution engine and active content discovery handle the volume problem that trips up teams with hundreds of assets, while NIST ID.RA and PR.PS coverage confirms it's built for continuous risk assessment and platform hardening, not just checklist compliance. Skip this if your main need is vulnerability management and remediation orchestration; Trickest is a scanner, not a ticketing system.