Aryaka Unified SASE as a Service vs Todyl Platform: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Aryaka Unified SASE as a Service

Mid-market and enterprise security teams managing distributed offices or remote workforces should evaluate Aryaka Unified SASE as a Service primarily for its single-pass inspection architecture, which eliminates the performance tax most SASE platforms impose on encrypted traffic. The platform's strength in PR.AA (Identity Management and Access Control) and PR.DS (Data Security) aligns with zero-trust enforcement and DLP simultaneously, reducing the number of tools you need to stitch together. Skip this if your priority is recovery and resilience orchestration; Aryaka is built for prevention and detection, not incident response automation.

Todyl Platform

Mid-market and enterprise teams drowning in alert fatigue from disconnected EDR and SIEM tools will find real value in Todyl Platform's ability to correlate endpoint and network signals in one place, cutting false positives that waste SOC cycles. The 24/7 managed detection service means you're not staffing round-the-clock coverage yourself, which is the actual constraint most teams face. Skip this if you need best-of-breed point solutions; Todyl trades some depth in any single domain for operational efficiency across the entire detection and response chain.