Armis Centrix™ for VIPR Pro vs Qualys TruConfirm: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Armis Centrix™ for VIPR Pro

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in vulnerability alerts from disparate scanners will see the fastest ROI from Armis Centrix™ for VIPR Pro because it actually collapses finding duplication and groups fixes by root cause instead of just ranking risk scores. The AI-driven consolidation cuts alert volume hard while the end-to-end remediation workflows with ownership assignment force accountability downstream, a gap most exposure management tools leave unfilled. Skip this if your team wants a lightweight cloud-only scanner or needs forensic-grade incident analysis; Centrix™ is built for organizations that have detection figured out but remediation workflows that leak.

Qualys TruConfirm

Mid-market and enterprise security teams drowning in vulnerability noise will get real value from Qualys TruConfirm because it actually validates which vulnerabilities are exploitable rather than just flagging everything as critical. Six Sigma accuracy on scanning combined with automated exposure validation means you spend triage time on threats that matter, not sorting through false positives. Skip this if your team runs mostly on-premises infrastructure or needs deep forensic context after an incident; TruConfirm is built for prioritization upfront, not post-breach analysis.