Armis Centrix™ for Medical Device Security vs SAM rAPId: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)

Armis Centrix™ for Medical Device Security

Mid-market and enterprise healthcare security teams drowning in unmanaged medical device sprawl need Armis Centrix because it actually finds what you don't know is there, then tells you which devices actually matter for patient safety. Passive discovery across unagented devices combined with patient-centric risk prioritization covers NIST ID.AM and DE.CM without requiring network cooperation or device access, which is critical when you're managing legacy ventilators and infusion pumps alongside IT assets. Skip this if your organization wants one platform handling both OT and IT vulnerabilities end-to-end; Centrix prioritizes visibility and continuous monitoring over remediation workflow integration, so you'll still need separate patch management for the devices it surfaces.

SAM rAPId

Startups and mid-market ops teams struggling to inventory IoT and OT devices will find SAM rAPId's fingerprinting database of 500M+ devices far more useful than generic asset scanners that return incomplete or misclassified results. The API-first model means you integrate it directly into your existing workflows instead of running another scanning tool, and batch identification lets you process thousands of devices without manual effort. Skip this if your network is purely IT infrastructure with standard servers and workstations; you'll get better value from cheaper CMDB tools that don't need the fingerprinting layer SAM rAPId is built around.