ANY.RUN vs Munin: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
ANY.RUN is a commercial malware analysis tool by ANY.RUN. Munin is a free malware analysis tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Incident response teams and threat hunters who need to detonate suspicious files in a controlled environment and watch the execution in real time will get the most from ANY.RUN; its interactive sandbox lets you pivot through network calls, registry changes, and process trees live rather than waiting for static analysis reports. The platform supports over 100 malware families with behavioral signatures, and the free tier removes friction for teams validating samples before escalation. Skip this if you need post-incident forensics or deep code-level debugging; ANY.RUN prioritizes live observation over artifact recovery.
Incident responders and threat analysts who need fast hash lookups across multiple feeds without managing API keys or subscriptions should use Munin. It aggregates Virustotal, HybridAnalysis, and other sources in a single free query, cutting lookup time from five separate tabs to one; the 846 GitHub stars reflect real adoption in SOC workflows. Skip this if you need automated enrichment at scale or integration with your SIEM; Munin is a manual triage tool, not an orchestration platform.
