Antiy PTA-mobile vs getJS: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, compared head to head.
Antiy PTA-mobile is a commercial malware analysis tool by Antiy Labs. getJS is a free security scanning tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best malware analysis fit for your security stack. Independent and vendor-neutral: our scores and rankings are earned, never bought — sponsored placement is always labeled.
CST VerdictShort answer
Mid-market and enterprise security teams handling high-volume Android app intake will benefit most from Antiy PTA-mobile's ability to monitor 200+ dynamic behaviors across 26 categories in a single sandbox run, capturing network traffic, file artifacts, and UI state without manual case work. The hybrid deployment model supports both server-based processing for large app batches and portable device carriers for field analysis, making it practical for carriers and regional security ops. Skip this if your organization needs upstream static analysis as a primary control; Antiy's strength is post-deployment behavioral visibility, not catching issues before apps ship. Penetration testers and bug bounty hunters chasing JavaScript sources will appreciate getJS for its speed and simplicity; it does one job,surface all JS files from a target,and does it without the bloat of full-stack recon frameworks. With 822 GitHub stars and active maintenance, it's proven reliable enough to become a standard in offensive workflows where reconnaissance must be fast and repeatable. Skip this if you need post-exploitation capabilities or OSINT depth; getJS is a knife, not a toolkit.
Based on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
