Antiy PTA-mobile vs FingerprintJS Android: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Antiy PTA-mobile is a commercial mobile app security tool by Antiy Labs. FingerprintJS Android is a free mobile app security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best mobile app security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of NIST CSF 2.0 coverage, core features, integrations, company size fit, here is our conclusion:
Mid-market and enterprise security teams handling high-volume Android app intake will benefit most from Antiy PTA-mobile's ability to monitor 200+ dynamic behaviors across 26 categories in a single sandbox run, capturing network traffic, file artifacts, and UI state without manual case work. The hybrid deployment model supports both server-based processing for large app batches and portable device carriers for field analysis, making it practical for carriers and regional security ops. Skip this if your organization needs upstream static analysis as a primary control; Antiy's strength is post-deployment behavioral visibility, not catching issues before apps ship.
Mobile app teams fighting account takeover and synthetic fraud need FingerprintJS Android because it identifies devices without requiring user consent or server-side infrastructure changes. The library's 683 GitHub stars and zero crash rate across production deployments prove it won't become a stability liability. Skip this if you need server-side fingerprinting or cross-platform device graphs; FingerprintJS Android is client-side only and won't solve fraud detection on web or backend APIs.
