Android port of Radamsa vs steg86: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. steg86 is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Red teamers and adversarial security researchers will find steg86 valuable for embedding payloads and exfiltration markers into binaries without triggering size-based detection or performance monitoring. The tool maintains binary integrity across x86 and AMD64 architectures while preserving execution behavior, which matters when evading file integrity checks that catch appended data. Skip this if your team needs post-exploitation persistence; steg86 solves delivery and initial access obfuscation, not staying power.
