Android port of Radamsa vs SharpC2: Side-by-Side Comparison (2026)
Features, pricing, ratings, and pros & cons — compared head-to-head.
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. SharpC2 is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Red teamers and penetration testers who need a lightweight C# framework for hands-on offensive operations should pick SharpC2 for its native Windows integration and low operational friction compared to multi-language competitors. The 428 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal a tool that actually gets used in engagements rather than abandoned between releases. Skip this if your team relies on cross-platform flexibility or needs a full adversary simulation platform with reporting; SharpC2 is purpose-built for operators, not organizations buying offense as a checkbox.
