Android port of Radamsa vs PwnAuth: 2026 Comparison
Android port of Radamsa is a free offensive security tool. PwnAuth is a free offensive security tool. Compare features, ratings, integrations, and community reviews side by side to find the best offensive security fit for your security stack.
CST VerdictBased on our analysis of available product data, here is our conclusion:
Mobile security teams testing native Android libraries and system components need Android port of Radamsa because it's one of the few fuzzers that generates valid mutation sequences across ARM and x86 ABIs without requiring app recompilation. The tool's 68 GitHub stars and zero-dependency native compilation via Android NDK make it fast to integrate into CI/CD pipelines for pre-release fuzzing of C/C++ code. Skip this if you're fuzzing Kotlin/Java app logic or need guided feedback-driven fuzzing; Radamsa is mutation-based and dumb, which is exactly why it finds edge cases that smarter fuzzers miss.
Red teamers and penetration testers who need to quickly spin up authentication tokens across SSH, OAuth, JWT, and API protocols without writing custom scripts should start with PwnAuth. The 398 GitHub stars and active maintenance signal it's actually being used in engagements, not abandoned after a conference talk. Skip this if you're looking for a commercial tool with vendor support or a GUI; PwnAuth is CLI-native and expects you to read the code when something breaks.
